Sanctions Top-5 for the week ending 14 May 2021

Here are five things that happened this week in the world of economic sanctions that I think you should know about.

Sign up here if you would like to receive these summaries by email. Click here for an index of past Sanctions Top-5 briefings.

This week’s briefing covers the weeks ending 7 and 14 May 2021.

  1. The Department of Defense will remove Xiaomi Corporation from the list of so-called “Communist Chinese military companies,” according to a filing in the District Court for the District of Columbia. In March 2021, the Court granted Xiaomi’s request for a preliminary injunction against the designation and subsequent ban on US persons transacting in the company’s publicly traded securities under Executive Order 13959.

Comments

More than 20 percent of companies identified by the Department of Defense as CCMCs on 14 January 2021 (that is to say, two out of nine companies) are no longer subject to Executive Order 13959 as a result of preliminary injunctions. Those are remarkably good odds, and it makes me wonder what the other seven companies are planning to do after seeing the District Court’s decisions. It looks like the Biden administration is picking its fights rather than defending out-there actions made one week before the inauguration. (See also Dan Gertler.)

The EU Advocate General’s opinion on the Blocking Statute underscores the conundrum faced by EU companies in navigating secondary sanctions risk involving Iran and Cuba. To my eyes, the opinion seems to be limited to companies that are “subject to US primary sanctions” — which seems to mean Specially Designated Nationals (SDNs). In other words, there is a higher bar when terminating a contract with an SDN because an EU company would have to show that it had a reason other than wanting to conform to US secondary sanctions when it broke the deal. Meanwhile, the opinion floats the idea that a company would not breach the Blocking Statute if the termination fell under “a coherent and systematic corporate social responsibility policy which leads them, inter alia, to refuse to deal with any company having links with the Iranian regime.” But why wait for the SDN designation in that case?

I’m looking forward to discussing this case and more with Benjamin Miao of Fangda Partners on our panel “Secondary Sanctions and Conflicts of Law: How to Navigate Complex and Potentially Conflicting Obligations” at next weeks’ virtual Asia Pacific Advanced Conference on Economic Sanctions hosted by ACI on 27 and 28 May. (You can still register for the conference here.)

Like the Top-5? Contact me to talk about tailored sanctions briefings for your team. Did I miss something? Send me a message or comment on LinkedIn.

(The views expressed are my own and do not constitute legal advice. Photo from Vladislav Reshetnyak.)

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Nicholas Turner

US attorney in Hong Kong specializing in economic sanctions, financial crimes. Sign up for emails: http://eepurl.com/cVhTXf LinkedIn at: http://goo.gl/KX1jER